<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Chrome, Is it Secure enough?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sizlopedia.com/2008/09/29/google-chrome-a-security-risk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sizlopedia.com/2008/09/29/google-chrome-a-security-risk/</link>
	<description>All about Apple, Google, Microsoft, Gadgets and the Web.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:40:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Greasemonkey for Google Chrome</title>
		<link>http://www.sizlopedia.com/2008/09/29/google-chrome-a-security-risk/#comment-41368</link>
		<dc:creator>Greasemonkey for Google Chrome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 03:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sizlopedia.com/?p=3095#comment-41368</guid>
		<description>[...] users are beginning to love Google Chrome like crazy, we still hate it for insecure and unstable. Other demerits such as missing support for plugins/extensions just add up more to our hatred [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] users are beginning to love Google Chrome like crazy, we still hate it for insecure and unstable. Other demerits such as missing support for plugins/extensions just add up more to our hatred [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Chrome Gets its First Major Update</title>
		<link>http://www.sizlopedia.com/2008/09/29/google-chrome-a-security-risk/#comment-40687</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Chrome Gets its First Major Update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 21:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sizlopedia.com/?p=3095#comment-40687</guid>
		<description>[...] speeds and a responsive UI, while others called it a total failure. We also highlighted some of the security issues of the browser, and hoped that it would improve in the future. Apparently, the guys at the Chromium Project are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] speeds and a responsive UI, while others called it a total failure. We also highlighted some of the security issues of the browser, and hoped that it would improve in the future. Apparently, the guys at the Chromium Project are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UzEE</title>
		<link>http://www.sizlopedia.com/2008/09/29/google-chrome-a-security-risk/#comment-40524</link>
		<dc:creator>UzEE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 17:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sizlopedia.com/?p=3095#comment-40524</guid>
		<description>Chrome was released as per schedule. The comic was the only thing that came out prematurely. Google has been quiet since Chrome&#039;s release so its hard to tell what they are up to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chrome was released as per schedule. The comic was the only thing that came out prematurely. Google has been quiet since Chrome&#8217;s release so its hard to tell what they are up to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YonyonJohn</title>
		<link>http://www.sizlopedia.com/2008/09/29/google-chrome-a-security-risk/#comment-40519</link>
		<dc:creator>YonyonJohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 14:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sizlopedia.com/?p=3095#comment-40519</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s also worth remembering that GC was probably released earlier than google had hoped because the cartoon was leaked. I agree that this will be a good test to see how fast google responds to browser vulnerabilities. the record is two months, set by apple, shouldn&#039;t be hard to beat :P.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s also worth remembering that GC was probably released earlier than google had hoped because the cartoon was leaked. I agree that this will be a good test to see how fast google responds to browser vulnerabilities. the record is two months, set by apple, shouldn&#8217;t be hard to beat <img src='http://www.sizlopedia.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UzEE</title>
		<link>http://www.sizlopedia.com/2008/09/29/google-chrome-a-security-risk/#comment-40476</link>
		<dc:creator>UzEE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sizlopedia.com/?p=3095#comment-40476</guid>
		<description>That 4% ratio pretty much suggests that people are doing just that ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That 4% ratio pretty much suggests that people are doing just that <img src='http://www.sizlopedia.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ehsan</title>
		<link>http://www.sizlopedia.com/2008/09/29/google-chrome-a-security-risk/#comment-40468</link>
		<dc:creator>Ehsan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 12:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sizlopedia.com/?p=3095#comment-40468</guid>
		<description>Google Chrome sucks people should stick to Firefox !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Chrome sucks people should stick to Firefox !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
