<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Colorize those Old Photos with Recolored</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sizlopedia.com/2009/01/12/colorize-old-photos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sizlopedia.com/2009/01/12/colorize-old-photos/</link>
	<description>All about Apple, Google, Microsoft, Gadgets and the Web.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:17:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Zubair</title>
		<link>http://www.sizlopedia.com/2009/01/12/colorize-old-photos/#comment-44177</link>
		<dc:creator>Zubair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 06:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sizlopedia.com/?p=5380#comment-44177</guid>
		<description>That is a handy application for amateurs but if you have little knowledge of Photoshop, you can color you between photo better than this application in Photoshop and that is not that tough as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a handy application for amateurs but if you have little knowledge of Photoshop, you can color you between photo better than this application in Photoshop and that is not that tough as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transcontinental</title>
		<link>http://www.sizlopedia.com/2009/01/12/colorize-old-photos/#comment-43472</link>
		<dc:creator>Transcontinental</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sizlopedia.com/?p=5380#comment-43472</guid>
		<description>As an amateur of photography I entirely disagree with the very purpose of recoloring: let the picture be whatever it was. I&#039;d only accept correcting the damage due to time or handling and, still, in a very respectful attitude towards the original content and layout. What is this strange concept which would be an odd interpretation of aesthetics?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an amateur of photography I entirely disagree with the very purpose of recoloring: let the picture be whatever it was. I&#8217;d only accept correcting the damage due to time or handling and, still, in a very respectful attitude towards the original content and layout. What is this strange concept which would be an odd interpretation of aesthetics?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
